Amelie Van Impe vs Margaux Maquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Maquet and Impe compare on second serve performance? Impe slightly leads with 37.71% compared to Maquet's 36.87%, suggesting a marginal advantage on serve points.
• In return game stats, Impe edges out on second serve returns with 53.73% over Maquet's 51.13%, but Maquet slightly leads on first serve returns at 35.35% compared to Impe's 34.94%.
• Under pressure, Impe seems more adept, saving 50.32% of breakpoints in recent form against Maquet's 46.41%, indicative of better performance in critical moments.
• Overall match performance over the past year favors Impe, with a win percentage of 68.97%, while Maquet stands at 54.55%. Does this indicate a stronger overall consistency for Impe?
• Maquet's best surface is Hard with a 72% win rate, while Impe excels on Clay at 68%. Both struggle comparatively on I.hard surfaces.
• In competitive environments, Impe has a higher win rate (75.61%) in $10K tournaments compared to Maquet's 61.11%, possibly reflecting better adaptability in these contests.
• Examining opponent quality, Maquet often faces slightly higher-ranked opponents (average rank 330.3) than Impe's opponents (average rank 369.52).
• If the match enters a deciding set, Impe has a higher success rate, winning 59%, whereas Maquet has only secured 40% in these tight situations.
• In recent breakpoint opportunities, Impe has been more effective, converting 48.15% as opposed to Maquet’s 34%, highlighting an essential advantage during critical game points.

Editorial Prediction (August 21, 2025, UTC):

As Maquet and Impe prepare for their upcoming match, statistical analysis provides a clear narrative of Impe's slight upper hand. Given Impe's edge in second serve success and an impressive return game, they appear more equipped for baseline rallies.

Impe's ability to save a higher percentage of breakpoints under pressure adds to their competitive edge, which is vital in key moments. His overall match win rate over the past year also signifies a more consistent and reliable performance at this level.

Though Maquet has an advantage on hard surfaces, the critical breakpoint conversion rate suggests that Impe may capitalize more efficiently on game-defining moments.

Considering all aspects, from matchup dynamics to recent performance trends, Impe seems the more likely victor in this forthcoming clash.